[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Silly question about "lock"
From: |
Dan Mahoney, System Admin |
Subject: |
Re: Silly question about "lock" |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Nov 2008 20:32:28 -0500 (EST) |
User-agent: |
Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) |
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Micah Cowan wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
hey, is there a way to customize the message displayed on the "lock",
for example:
Whether it was locked by time, or idle?
What time it was locked?
What HOST it's running on?
These could all be managed now, through the use of a custom "lock"
program (specified via the $LOCKPRG environment variable).
Of which I can't find any useful that solve the problems I'm looking to
solve -- those problems manifested after I started this thread, tho.
You could differentiate between "idle" locks and explicit locks by
having "idle" give the lock program a special arg or something.
Really? How? Will idle accept full-on commands, or just "screen"
commands?
I don't believe we'll implement these in screen's built-in lock program
at this time.
The hostname tweak is a three line patch (that BSD already has as an
option).
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/sysutils/screen/files/opt-hostinlocked?rev=1.1;content-type=text%2Fplain;sortby=date
The others, could be done by having "lockscreen" accept arguments.
Trent's issue (i.e. wanting both a blanker and a lock) could be solved by
accepting multiple "idle" arguments.
-Dan
--
--------Dan Mahoney--------
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM
Site: http://www.gushi.org
---------------------------