Re: -X bug?

[Frederik Eaton]

Are there any plans to fix this? I'll probably go back to 3.9.15 if
there aren't... I haven't been using "-X next", but I have been using
"-X escape" heavily and that's broken too. What was new in version 4?

Also, there are several mailing addresses given in the screen distro,
are these live? For instance the end of the man page says:

  Send bug-reports, fixes, enhancements, t-shirts, money, beer & pizza
  to address@hidden

I sent a patch or two to these addresses a while ago and got no
response.

Frederik

On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 01:24:47PM -0700, Frederik Eaton wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 01:56:50PM +0200, Juergen Weigert wrote:
> > On Apr 06, 05 10:27:03 -0700, Frederik Eaton wrote:
> > > OK, just tested and for me 'next' works if the session is attached
> > > somewhere, but not if it is detached. Did you try it with the test
> > > session detached?
> > 
> > True. '-X next' has no effect on a detached session. 
> > Was that any different with earlier versions?
> 
> I believe it was, in 3.9.15. But is there a reason why the behavior
> should be different depending on whether or not the session is
> attached somewhere else? If you do
> 
> 1. attach
> 2. -X next
> 3. detach
> 4. attach
> 
> ... then the effect of the 'next' command is still visible on step 4.
> But if you switch steps 2 and 3 there is no effect. I don't think that
> is desirable.
> 
> Frederik
> 
> -- 
> http://ofb.net/~frederik/
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> screen-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/screen-users
> 

-- 
http://ofb.net/~frederik/