[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reply to header
|
From: |
Eric D. Hendrickson |
|
Subject: |
Re: Reply to header |
|
Date: |
Tue, 02 Nov 2004 11:54:21 -0600 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Security Through Obscurity, linux) |
Suso Banderas <address@hidden> writes:
> Sigh, I know. I already use G and r for replying, I was trying to
> avoid using L. I guess I just don't think of mutt in that way (using
> different reply keys for different things). Most other lists I'm on
> just have a Reply-To: header instead. I thought I might be able to get
> you guys to agree to do this. But if not, no big deal.
Personally, I don't like lists with a Reply-To: header. Because when
I want to reply just to the author of a message, I have to manually
change the To: field.
Eric
Re: Reply to header, Tom von Schwerdtner, 2004/11/02