[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Savannah-register-public] [task #13452] Submission of GNU Artanis
From: |
Assaf Gordon |
Subject: |
[Savannah-register-public] [task #13452] Submission of GNU Artanis |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Jan 2015 18:25:23 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_9_5) AppleWebKit/537.78.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/7.0.6 Safari/537.78.2 |
Update of task #13452 (project administration):
Status: None => Done
Assigned to: None => agn
Open/Closed: Open => Closed
_______________________________________________________
Follow-up Comment #1:
Hello Mu Lei,
Thank you for submitting a new GNU program.
The project has been created, and you should receive and email with
instructions shortly.
There are few minor issues with the attached tarball, please consider amending
them:
1.
The file 'artanis/irregex.scm' mentioned "BSD-Style license", which is not
specific enough - the original BSD license is not GPL compatible, and so it is
recommended to explicitly specify which BSD license it is. Additionally, the
URL of the license points to a non-existing page (
http://synthcode.com/license.txt )
2.
Few source code files do not have copyright statement and license notice:
examples/blog.scm
examples/test.scm
examples/upload.scm
It is recommended to add a clear copyright and license to all source code
files.
3.
Small supporting files can use the GNU All permissive license (
http://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/License-Notices-for-Other-Files.html
),
these are:
autogen.sh
configure.ac
4.
There is an image file 'examples/img/0.jpg' which looks like a TV
screen-shot.
Please ensure this is free (as in freedom), and is legally available under a
free license. If not, please remove it.
An icon file (./examples/favicon.ico) is also included - please ensure it is
also available under a free license.
If you created it, please state the copyright and license for the file in a
README file (or a mother similar file). If it was created elsewhere, please
state the copyright, license and original source for the file.
5.
The license in the project submission said 'dual licensed, GPLv3+ and
LGPLv3+'.
However, I could not find any reference to 'dual licensing', either the
README/README.md files, or in the source code files.
Please ensure the licensing is clear, by adding the appropriate information.
Regards,
- Assaf
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?13452>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/