[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Savannah-register-public] Re: [gnu.org #220951] LGPL-compatibility of C
Sylvain Beucler via RT
[Savannah-register-public] Re: [gnu.org #220951] LGPL-compatibility of Condor and LAM-MPI
Sat, 05 Feb 2005 03:53:03 -0500
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 07:54:46PM -0500, Dave Turner via RT wrote:
> > address@hidden - Thu Feb 03 17:53:44 2005]:
> > Hello,
> > I am reviewing the 'paradiseo' project at Savannah. This software
> > relies among others on Condor and LAM-MPI.
> > The 'paradiseo' project is released under the GNU *L*GPL. I would like
> > to know if the dependencies licenses are compatible with the LGPL.
> > The license of Condor can be found here:
> > http://www.cs.wisc.edu/condor/downloads/v6.7.license.html
> > I am wondering about sections 3 and 4.
> > The license of LAM-MPI is attached or can be found in:
> > http://www.lam-mpi.org/download/files/lam-7.1.1.tar.bz2
> > That one looks like a PHP license.
> They can be combined with LGPL works, but the work as a whole can't be
> licensed under the LGPL, and can't be combined with GPL works.
Do you see a way to license the 'paradiseo' code under a GNU
GPL-compatible license, while allowing it to use Condor and LAM-MPI?
Relicensing 'paradiseo' under the Expat license?
- [Savannah-register-public] Re: [gnu.org #220951] LGPL-compatibility of Condor and LAM-MPI,
Sylvain Beucler via RT <=