[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] SavannahHosts r212
From: |
Bob Proulx |
Subject: |
Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] SavannahHosts r212 |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Aug 2016 16:50:09 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
Karl Berry wrote:
> Bob writes:
> +* Are people using download for a pserver? There are notes to that
> + effect in the download /etc/default/iptables-rules file.
>
> locate /CVS/ on download tells me there is a CVS repository for
> audio-video (nothing else). Whether it is still used, have to ask
> "them" (whoever "they" are nowadays :). -k
It is more crazy than that. In the download
/etc/default/iptables-rules file I find this:
*nat
:PREROUTING ACCEPT
:POSTROUTING ACCEPT
:OUTPUT ACCEPT
# Forward cvspserver connections to vcs-noshell
# FIXME: are people really using download.savannah.gnu.org for pserver?
-A PREROUTING -d 208.118.235.73 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 2401 -j DNAT
--to-destination 208.118.235.72
COMMIT
That is DNAT relaying the connection to download over to vcs. I think
that means there isn't any pserver possible to be running on download
but that connections to download are transparently using vcs instead.
I don't think that is a desirable configuration. I don't think we
want to continue it. But I listed it as a "huh, what?" when I saw
that. I think we should definitely not continue it and then deal with
any pserver connections as needed.
Bob