Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] GNU/non-GNU distinction

[Noah Slater]

On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 05:30:35PM -0600, Karl Berry wrote:
> In addition to what the others wrote ... well, it is simply a
> fundamental distinction.  GNU packages have been accepted as part of
> GNU, and as you know there is a nontrivial process for that.  Non-GNU
> packages have not.  I'm a bit baffled as to why you're asking.

Sorry, in retrospect perhaps I worded my question confusingly.

What I really meant to ask is why is there is a distinction made like this:

  http://savannah.gnu.org/
  http://savannah.nongnu.org/

I agree that it's an important distinction to make, but I was wondering if it
would make more sense to have everything under savannah.gnu.org and
differentiate using a different set of page templates or similar for GNU.

Thanks,

--
Noah Slater <http://bytesexual.org/>