[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] admin help
From: |
Sylvain Beucler |
Subject: |
Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] admin help |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Apr 2006 10:07:20 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060126 |
Since you have a fencepost account and contribute to GNU Emacs, we can
reasonably trust you.
We granted you access to ~svadmin. This is a normal user account from
which you can look at the system, and make a proposal for improvement
:)
Feel free to drop by #savannah on Freenode and/or send mail to this
list.
--
Sylvain
On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 09:15:31AM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> Savannah admins, I need your point! See below.
>
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 06:28:04PM +0100, Dave Love wrote:
> > Sorry I got called away and I'm about to go away again for the weekend.
> >
> > Sylvain Beucler <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > > I don't remember seeing your previous mail, but help is still welcome.
> >
> > It was some time ago. No matter.
> >
> > > We would like to have as much help as possible for the project
> > > submissions reviews, because this is what the most time-consuming
> > > task today.
> >
> > OK, I can doubtless do some of that. I can also do sysadmin jobs if
> > that's any use. [Do you have a monitoring system in place for the
> > services? I have some experience of that if it's of any interest.]
>
> That's of interest :)
>
> > > Our other tasks are mostly described at
> > > https://savannah.gnu.org/maintenance/TasksList
> >
> > I'll check it after the weekend.
> >
> > > Do you already have some wishes about how you would like to help?
> >
> > Not particularly, although I'd be quite interested in keeping my hand
> > in at sysadmin while I'm not doing it professionally.
> >
> > > We would also be much interested in some story-telling about the time
> > > when some people had root on the GNU systems :)
> >
> > I don't think there's much to tell. People were generally trusted in
> > those days if they were reasonably well-known, and if something needed
> > doing, you tended to be given the means of doing it yourself. These
> > days even rms seems to worry somewhat about security (rightly so).
>
> From what you said, we can expect some punctual contribution from you.
>
> Currently, we trust Savannah contributors by involving them in the
> long term with increasing privileges grants, which may or may not be a
> good idea.
>
> Since it probably won't fit with your situation, let's discuss with
> the other admins about giving you more directly some shell access. For
> example, we could give you normal user access for you to study the
> installation (in addition to reading the docs about it), then discuss
> what we could do about that, and possibly give you the means to do it.
>
> Then everything about what you do and intend to do will be a matter of
> communication :)