savannah-cvs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Savannah-cvs] administration/docs/hacking_savannah TODO


From: Sylvain Beucler
Subject: [Savannah-cvs] administration/docs/hacking_savannah TODO
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 13:07:20 -0500

CVSROOT:        /cvsroot/administration
Module name:    administration
Branch:         
Changes by:     Sylvain Beucler <address@hidden>        05/01/26 18:07:20

Modified files:
        docs/hacking_savannah: TODO 

Log message:
        *** empty log message ***

CVSWeb URLs:
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/administration/administration/docs/hacking_savannah/TODO.diff?tr1=1.3&tr2=1.4&r1=text&r2=text

Patches:
Index: administration/docs/hacking_savannah/TODO
diff -u administration/docs/hacking_savannah/TODO:1.3 
administration/docs/hacking_savannah/TODO:1.4
--- administration/docs/hacking_savannah/TODO:1.3       Wed Dec  8 23:36:26 2004
+++ administration/docs/hacking_savannah/TODO   Wed Jan 26 18:07:20 2005
@@ -62,3 +62,15 @@
 
 This poses no problem at all, since they don't say you have to remove
 the trademarks under any condition.
+
+
+
+<Beuc> zeus: btw, I think it is not of our competence to look at non-obvious 
patent issues like the "Dijkstra algorithm"
+<Beuc> incidentally I think it is a simple algorithm that I learnt at school
+<zeus> yes, it isn't of our competence, but IMHO it is of our competence know 
if that algorithm it's licensed or not
+<zeus> Beuc: hehe, I know nothing about that algorithm, that's why I ask him
+<Beuc> zeus: for consistency, we should then study if all patented algorithm 
are licensed to be used in free software...
+<zeus> Beuc: I'll be more carefully about that point
+
+
+http://fsfeurope.org/news/article2001-10-20-01.en.html




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]