[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Rule-list] Modified installer
From: |
Brock Organ |
Subject: |
Re: [Rule-list] Modified installer |
Date: |
19 Feb 2002 09:07:26 -0500 |
On Mon, 2002-02-18 at 20:34, Devon wrote:
>
> Yes, but troubling that your machine failed to boot with the mem=24M
> parameter. I can't see where it could be related to the installer
> changes, however. The fact that it boots without the kernel parameter
> would seem to indicate that the module exists and can be loaded.
> If you have the time and inclination, could you do a base install (custom
> class, selecting no packages) of the official release and try the mem=24M
> option? I'm curious, but have no means at my disposal to test this
> further.
I've since tested the RULE image on a different machine (ide based) and
the mem= line works just fine ... I've seen this issue enough in the
last few months to know there is a gremlin somewhere (probably in the
kernel or initrd) but we haven't nailed down the problem ...
--
Brock Organ QA Engineer address@hidden
"That which we are, we are..." "I `em what I`em!"
-Alfred, Lord Tennyson -Popeye, Lord Sailor
- [Rule-list] Modified installer, Devon, 2002/02/14
- Re: [Rule-list] Modified installer, Benoit Mortier, 2002/02/15
- Re: [Rule-list] Modified installer, Brock Organ, 2002/02/15
- Re: [Rule-list] Modified installer, Devon, 2002/02/15
- Re: [Rule-list] Modified installer, Brock Organ, 2002/02/15
- Re: [Rule-list] Modified installer, Devon, 2002/02/15
- Re: [Rule-list] Modified installer, Brock Organ, 2002/02/18
- Re: [Rule-list] Modified installer, Devon, 2002/02/18
- Re: [Rule-list] Modified installer,
Brock Organ <=
- Re: [Rule-list] Modified installer, Devon, 2002/02/19
- Re: [Rule-list] Modified installer, Devon, 2002/02/15
- Re: [Rule-list] Modified installer, Brock Organ, 2002/02/18
- Re: [Rule-list] Modified installer, Brock Organ, 2002/02/18
Re: [Rule-list] Modified installer, Martin Stricker, 2002/02/15