[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Ring] Idea/Question: Refactoring your development
From: |
Anna Marei |
Subject: |
Re: [Ring] Idea/Question: Refactoring your development |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Feb 2018 15:38:36 +0100 (CET) |
Hello Maxim!
> Maxim Cournoyer <address@hidden> hat am 26. Februar 2018 um 21:16 geschrieben:
>
>
> Hello Anna!
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Anna Marei" <address@hidden>
> > To: address@hidden
> > Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2018 7:41:48 AM
> > Subject: [Ring] Idea/Question: Refactoring your development
>
> > Hello, I would like to contribute to the development of Ring.
>
> Cool!
Yeah ;)
>
> > Unfortunately, Tuleap seems too chaotic and incomprehensible to me as an
> > outsider. User stories, milestones and tasks are sometimes several years old
> > and there is no roadmap or prioritization to identify them.
>
> The only features of Tuleap currently actively used are the Wiki (see:
> https://tuleap.ring.cx/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/ring/index.php?title=Main_Page)
> the Bugs (see: https://tuleap.ring.cx/plugins/tracker/?tracker=15) and
> Enhancements (see: https://tuleap.ring.cx/plugins/tracker/?tracker=17)
> trackers.
>
> > In addition, the
> > fourfold solution with Tuleap, Gerrit, Transifex and GitHub further enhances
> > this chaos of development (for people from outside) of your actually great
> > product.
> > For example, a self-hosted instance of GitLab would be a very modern way of
> > managing the entire production and review and translation process of
> > software
> > such as Ring under one roof.
> > What do you think?
> > Best regards
>
> I agree the system is complex and heterogeneous. I'll try to bring your ideas
> into a discussion with the core Ring developers. It is on our roadmap to
> discuss how to improve the community aspects of Ring.
Cool! When will you meet/discuss that topic?
>
> Thank you for sharing your ideas about Ring!
>
> Maxim