repo-criteria-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Please review codeberg.org


From: Richard Stallman
Subject: Re: Please review codeberg.org
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 11:44:36 -0400

[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]

  > > Only A5 and A+3 are marked as 
  > > TODO. Let me know if I have missed anything.

  > it is probably acceptable to omit some criteria, at a level
  > beyond which the forge meets fully - that is the assumption is
  > made when reviewing notabug.org

In principle, it is acceptable, but is there really any uncertainty left
in those two answers?  I think we can settle them now.  Or perhaps
we already have done so in this discussion.

-- 
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]