Re: Please review codeberg.org

[Yuchen Pei]

Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:

> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider 
> ]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, 
> ]]]
> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's 
> example. ]]]
>
>   > I filled in B2 based on answer to Q9 at 
>   > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-06/msg00005.html. There's 
>   > also Q13 but that is for A2.
>
> I can't access messages easily using those URLs.  Would you 
> please
> identify the message by its From: field and its Date; field?
> With those, I can find it quickly.

From: Adam Faiz

>   > I'm not sure if the choice of licenses is discussed 
>   > elsewhere on 
>   > the docs.
>
> B2 is NOT just a matter of "choosing" the license.  Whichever 
> form of
> licensing you choose, you must state it clearly _in the package
> source_.  If a site doesn't tell people to do that, and give 
> clear
> directions to do it right, then it encourages unclear licensing
> practices.

You are right, and after reading the forwarded discussions, I 
agree codeberg failed B2. Updated 
https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Codeberg.

>   > By the way I could not navigate the 
>   > https://docs.codeberg.org with 
>   > librejs on:
>
>   > > blocked scripts in https://docs.codeberg.org/:
>   > > 
>   > > https://docs.codeberg.org/assets/js/collapse.js:
>   > > 
>   > > External script with no known license
>   > > https://docs.codeberg.org/assets/js/sidebar.js:
>   > > 
>   > > External script with no known license
>
>   > Does that mean it fails C0?
>
> I think so.  But I don't know what docs.codeberg.org/ does. 
> What does
> it do?  Is it an important site function?  (That is a judgment 
> call,
> not a mechanical decision.)

It is the documentation site of codeberg.org and the place where I 
looked for answer to Q9. I think it is rather important for 
someone unfamiliar with codeberg, but not so much for an 
experienced user. Attached is a screenshot of the landing page 
with the toc on and librejs off. Turning on librejs, the toc seems 
to be only accessible by inspecting the source of the webpage.

OTOH the blocked scripts seem rather simple:

https://docs.codeberg.org/assets/js/collapse.js
https://docs.codeberg.org/assets/js/sidebar.js

I think the way forward on this is to report the issue and / or 
send a pull request at the repo 
https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Documentation

Best,
Yuchen

docs.codeberg.org-librejs.png
Description: PNG image

--
PGP Key: 47F9 D050 1E11 8879 9040  4941 2126 7E93 EF86 DFD0

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature