Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Libreoffice SpreadSheet Template for Evaluating Repos

[Aaron Wolf]

On 06/04/2018 12:55 AM, Félix Brezo (Personal) wrote:
> Sorry for this opportunistic refloat (because of Microsoft's movement towards 
> Github), but I feel that this Launchpad evaluation I am replying to can be 
> interesting to be added to the list in 
> <https://www.gnu.org/software/repo-criteria-evaluation.html>.
> 
> Launchpad's evaluation according to the report we did in 2016 was a C with 
> just one thing to promote to B:
> 
> B0 | All code sent to the user's browser must be free software and labeled 
> for LibreJS or other suitable free automatic license analyzer, regardless of 
> whether the site functions when the user disables this code. (B0) | Failed    
> | No. At least 13 scripts detected by LibreJS as inline, nonfree.
> 

Reference to LibreJS should always say "not identified as free/libre" or
similar. LibreJS failing to identify positively as free is not the same
thing as being nonfree.

> I can attach the .ODS template I prepared for this if you need to recover 
> this information. I feel that keeping this list updated is really interesting 
> for many people these days.
> 
> 
> El 12/12/16 a las 23:47, address@hidden escribió:
>> Hi again,
>>
>> You're all welcome! I agree with you that the more platforms evaluated the 
>> more relevant the efforts would be! Maybe a sort of badge could be awarded 
>> to those sites depending on their commitment. It'd look nice in the web now 
>> considering  the approach of Georgia Young so as to convince us of trying to 
>> make things look stylish too (FSF Bulletin #29). ;)
>>
>> Anyway, just as an example of my preliminar evaluation for Launchpad.net. 
>> Feel free to add any comments on it, specially in the Extra Credit section 
>> which (I'm sorry) I have not been capable of finding any explicit 
>> information in the platform.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Félix Brezo
>>
>> El lun, 12 de dic 2016 a las 8:11 , Zak Rogoff <address@hidden> escribió:
>>> On 12/08/2016 11:12 PM, Mike Gerwitz wrote:
>>>>  Hey, Félix:
>>>>
>>>>  On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 20:22:09 +0100, address@hidden wrote:
>>>>>  I have just found out about GNU ethical repository criteria in the FSF
>>>>>  Bulletin issue #29 and I have built a Libreoffice SpreadSheet template
>>>>>  to keep track of new evaluations for the future.
>>>>
>>>>  Thanks for sharing this---I hope that others will find it useful as
>>>>  well.
>>>>
>>>>  Zak: where would this type of thing be appropriate to upload?  The
>>>>  LibrePlanet wiki?
>>>
>>> Yeah, the LP wiki would be the right place.
>>>
>>> Thanks you, Felix.
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Zak Rogoff // Campaigns Manager
>>> Free Software Foundation
>>
>>
>>
>>
>