Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Gitea assessment: C5

[David Seaward]

Hi,

> Regarding C5 (Recommends and encourages GPL 3-or-later licensing
> at least as much as any other kind of licensing), when creating a
> new repo...

Just to follow up on this. I couldn't find a more definitive definition
of the C5 criteria. Am I missing something? (This is the last
outstanding issue in this evaluation so I'm keen to resolve it.)

Potential issues are 1) license choice is empty-by-default (but all
licenses listed equally) and 2) picking GPL-3.0 adds license text to a
new repo but no explicit choice between "only" and "or-later" (not sure
if this is an overly strict analysis, or de facto standard, and
accepted, behaviour).

Regards,
David

P.S. This follows on from

https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2017-10/msg000
00.html