repo-criteria-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] What's needed to publish the evaluations (ak


From: Mike Gerwitz
Subject: Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] What's needed to publish the evaluations (aka the longest email ever {aka two specific tasks})}
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 23:26:02 -0400
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.92 (gnu/linux)

On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 12:52:08 -0400, Zak Rogoff wrote:
> FOOTNOTE * In fact, if someone wants to get in touch with Richard and
> find a way to clarify how to evaluate C5 against situations with no
> license by default, that would be a helpful project.

Wouldn't this fall under B2?

  Does not encourage bad licensing practices (no license, unclear
  licensing, GPL N only). (B2)

-- 
Mike Gerwitz
Free Software Hacker | GNU Maintainer & Volunteer
https://mikegerwitz.com
FSF Member #5804 | GPG Key ID: 0x8EE30EAB

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]