[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Launched! Evaluation time

From: Aaron Wolf
Subject: Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Launched! Evaluation time
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 20:52:39 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0

Quick note for whoever did the SourceForge stuff: if it matters to
differntiate between LibreJS-recognized vs non-recognized automatically
but still free, Sourceforge uses almost entirely for all it's
stuff that isn't the landing pages and downloads (i.e. for wiki,
tickets, code views, etc), I have no reason to think it's even modified
really. I am not suggesting that SF passes otherwise, but I *definitely*
think there's some sense to recognizing that aspect (and the fact that
anyone could self-host Allura, of course)

On 10/22/2015 08:01 PM, Mike Gerwitz wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 19:38:55 -0200, Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro wrote:
>> Feel free to suggest improvements.  Although I do have a reasonably
>> current evaluation of GitLab ready for publication, I decided to let
>> this to Mike's discretion.
> We're holding off on the GitLab evaluation release until certain items
> are addressed.  I'll keep the list up to date.

Aaron Wolf
music teacher,

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]