rdiff-backup-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Reverse diffs are a standard such that patch can apply?


From: Robert Nichols
Subject: Re: Reverse diffs are a standard such that patch can apply?
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 12:07:35 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.7.1

On 2/15/23 10:32, rhkramer@gmail.com wrote:
I've googled enough to find out that rdiff stores the backup files as reverse
diffs so I should be able to go to the backup directory and copy the latest
version if I need that.

If I need an earlier version, presumably the diffs are a "standard" format such
that I can apply patch (multiple times as necessary) to get to the earlier
version I need?
You don't have to do any patching manually, just ask rdiff-backup to "restore" and use 
the "--at {time}" option to specify what version. The manpage explains this fairly 
clearly:

   restore [CREATION OPTIONS] [COMPRESSION OPTIONS] [SELECTION OPTIONS] 
[FILESYSTEM
   OPTIONS] [USER GROUP OPTIONS] [--at time|--increment] source targetdir
       restore a source backup repository at a specific time or a specific
       source increment to a target directory. See RESTORING for details.

       --at time
           the source parameter is interpreted as a back-up directory, and the
           content is restored from the given time. See TIME FORMATS for 
details.

       --increment
           the source parameter is expected to be an increment within a back-up
           repository, to be restored into the given target directory.


--
Bob Nichols     "NOSPAM" is really part of my email address.
                Do NOT delete it.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]