Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Development Status & Git/SVN

[Armando M. Baratti]

I've used Mercurial, but not for development, just for tracking changes on configuration files on my Linux servers.
It works great, is very fast and simple to use.

I think easiness of use is something to consider when thinking in a tool that is to be used by many people, as there is no vcs that will be already known by everyone.

---

Armando M. Baratti

LARC
  /Pesquisa de Marketing Ltda
Alameda dos Maracatins, 161 - Indianópolis
CEP 04089-010 - São Paulo - SP
Tel.: (11) 5051-3133 - Fax: (11) 5052-5955
http://www.larc.com.br/

Em 5/4/2010 10:43, Josh Nisly escreveu:

The last time I checked, git didn't have great support for Windows. Having fought to get CVS working there, I'd have a strong preference for something with better Windows support. Has anyone on this list had experience with Mercurial?

JoshN

Randy Syring wrote:

I saw a thread a month or two ago that discussed the absence of Andrew Ferguson and the possibility of moving the code to SVN/Git.  Has there been any further discussion on this on or off list?  FWIW, my preference would be to import the code history into git and then put the project on github.

_______________________________________________
rdiff-backup-users mailing list at address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rdiff-backup-users
Wiki URL: http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki