[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Performance
From: |
Dave Howorth |
Subject: |
Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Performance |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Feb 2007 11:25:25 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20060911) |
Greg Freemyer wrote:
> On 2/13/07, Dave Howorth <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Does anybody know of an alternative that performs better?
>>
>> I have a filesystem with millions of hard links and so far rdiff-backup
>> is the fastest thing I've found, even though it is slow.
>
> If you have millions of anything, then the filesystem selection
> probably matters more than the backup software. Reiser3 is known to
> have been specifically tuned to handle huge numbers of small files.
> (It was tuned to be a imap mail server with each msg being a
> standalone file.).
Yes, I use reiser3 :)
Cheers, Dave
- [rdiff-backup-users] Performance, Corey Puffalt, 2007/02/11
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Performance, Jim C. Nasby, 2007/02/12
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Performance, Dave Howorth, 2007/02/13
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Performance, Greg Freemyer, 2007/02/13
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Performance, Charles Duffy, 2007/02/13
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Performance, Scott Lamb, 2007/02/13
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Performance, Corey Puffalt, 2007/02/13
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Performance, rdiff, 2007/02/13
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Performance, Scott Lamb, 2007/02/13
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Performance,
Dave Howorth <=