[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [rdiff-backup-users] backup error due to different versions of rdiff
Re: [rdiff-backup-users] backup error due to different versions of rdiff-backup
Wed, 22 Feb 2006 21:02:45 -0600
>>>>> Wolfgang Dautermann <address@hidden>
>>>>> wrote the following on Sun, 22 Jan 2006 17:13:54 +0100
> Dr. Scott S. Jones wrote:
> > In general, an attempt is made to guarantee compatibility only between
> > different minor versions of the same stable series.
> Bye the way: What about upgrades on the server-side? E.g. I am running
> currently 1.0.0, but there are newer versions (1.0.4, 1.1.5) - can one
> expect that one can re-use the existing backups? Or should one 'backup
> the backups' and start with an empty directory for new backups?
Old repositories are always forwards compatible---you (should) never
need to erase your backup directory because you want to use a new
> And I have some additional feature-requests:
> (1) As far as I saw, there is no 'ls'-Feature, e.g.
> rdiff-backup --ls-at-time 2006-01-19 /backups/daute
> should output something like "ls -la /backups/daute" at a previous time.
Yes, good point. I wonder if I add this though, then someone will
want various sorting options, someone will think -la displays too much
information, etc. Personally I'm happy with -la output. Can anyone
think of a better display/format, or of a more flexible way to do
> (2) rdiff-Backup should be able to parse the date-formats from the own
> output. E.g. rdiff-backup --list-increment-sizes outputs something like
> "Sun Jan 22 00:05:04 2006 4.08 GB 4.08 GB (current mirror)", then
> rdiff-backup --list-at-time "Sun Jan 22 00:05:04 2006" /path/to/backup
> should work...
Ok, patch at
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] backup error due to different versions of rdiff-backup,
Ben Escoto <=