[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RP] dockapps
From: |
Joe Corneli |
Subject: |
Re: [RP] dockapps |
Date: |
Fri Jul 9 23:00:04 2004 |
> This post reminded me of an idea of mine that I've been meaning to
> post to the mailing list. I think it would be useful, at times, to
> glue together a bunch of frames into a single window (from the
> perspective of :windows, :next, :prev, :select etc).
> It would require introducing 'nested frames' of some sort, which would
> be tricky. I'm not sure quite what the best way to handle this would be.
I suggest the way to think about this is to have a 'dereference' and,
er, reference? operations for framesets or windowsets. Then
everything else acts as normal, but only upon the current `layer' or
`level of focus'.
If I can be bold, my point of view is that what's lacking is full
support for an already existing data-structure, usually called a
frameset but more accurately called a "windowframe". (I.e. a
particular assignment of windows to frames.) So put windowframes
into a ring that can be traversed by functions :fnext :fprev
:fselect. Does this avoid nested frames "of some sort"? I'm not
sure. But it does avoid overloading :windows.
Joe
- [RP] dockapps, Kevin Geiss, 2004/07/09
- Re: [RP] dockapps, Joe Corneli, 2004/07/10
- Re: [RP] dockapps, Cameron Patrick, 2004/07/10
- Re: [RP] dockapps, Trent Buck, 2004/07/10
- Re: [RP] dockapps,
Joe Corneli <=
- Re: [RP] dockapps, Cameron Patrick, 2004/07/10
- Re: [RP] dockapps, Trent Buck, 2004/07/10
- Re: [RP] dockapps, Joe Corneli, 2004/07/10
- Re: [RP] dockapps, Joe Corneli, 2004/07/10
- Re: [RP] dockapps, Trent Buck, 2004/07/10
- Re: [RP] dockapps, Joe Corneli, 2004/07/10
- Re: [RP] dockapps, Joe Corneli, 2004/07/15
Re: [RP] dockapps, Bob Crochelt, 2004/07/10