[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[RP] Re: Licensing terms for ratpoison info page
From: |
Graham Wilson |
Subject: |
[RP] Re: Licensing terms for ratpoison info page |
Date: |
Sun Apr 18 20:16:52 2004 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i |
On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 08:01:47PM -0500, Joe Corneli wrote:
> I think it would be better if GNU FDL/GPL were compatible both ways,
> but I think we'll be OK even if they aren't as long as we behave
> sanely and try to adhere to the "spirit" of the two documents.
Agreed.
Thanks Björn for trying to summarize all of the issues.
--
gram
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- [RP] Re: Licensing terms for ratpoison info page, (continued)
- Re: [RP] Licensing terms for ratpoison info page, Shawn Betts, 2004/04/18
- Re: [RP] Licensing terms for ratpoison info page, Gergely Nagy, 2004/04/18
- Re: [RP] Licensing terms for ratpoison info page, Joe Corneli, 2004/04/18
- [RP] Re: Licensing terms for ratpoison info page, Björn Lindström, 2004/04/18
- Re: [RP] Re: Licensing terms for ratpoison info page, Joe Corneli, 2004/04/18
- Re: [RP] Re: Licensing terms for ratpoison info page, Shawn Betts, 2004/04/18
- Re: [RP] Re: Licensing terms for ratpoison info page, Shawn Betts, 2004/04/18
- [RP] Re: Licensing terms for ratpoison info page,
Graham Wilson <=
- [RP] Re: Licensing terms for ratpoison info page, Graham Wilson, 2004/04/18