qemu-trivial
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] hw/i386/acpi-build: Resolve north rather than south b


From: B
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] hw/i386/acpi-build: Resolve north rather than south bridges
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 16:15:18 +0000


Am 28. Oktober 2022 10:58:07 UTC schrieb Ani Sinha <ani@anisinha.ca>:
>On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 4:05 PM Bernhard Beschow <shentey@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> The code currently assumes Q35 iff ICH9 and i440fx iff PIIX. Now that more
>> AML generation has been moved into the south bridges and since the
>> machines define themselves primarily through their north bridges, let's
>> switch to resolving the north bridges for AML generation instead. This
>> also allows for easier experimentation with different south bridges in
>> the "pc" machine, e.g. with PIIX4 and VT82xx.
>
>Unfortunately this patch does not apply on the latest master. Also the
>code seems to be off. Can you rebase and rework the patch?

I've rebased onto Igor's series to avoid merge conflicts, that's why it doesn't 
apply onto master. It applies fine there [1].

The first two patches of this series apply fine on both branches, so could 
possibly be pulled already if Igor's series doesn't make it for 7.2.

Best regards,
Bernhard

[1] 
https://github.com/patchew-project/qemu/commits/patchew/20221028103419.93398-1-shentey%40gmail.com
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Beschow <shentey@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 11 ++++++-----
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
>> index 73d8a59737..d9eaa5fc4d 100644
>> --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
>> +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
>> @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@
>>  #include "hw/i386/fw_cfg.h"
>>  #include "hw/i386/ich9.h"
>>  #include "hw/pci/pci_bus.h"
>> +#include "hw/pci-host/i440fx.h"
>>  #include "hw/pci-host/q35.h"
>>  #include "hw/i386/x86-iommu.h"
>>
>> @@ -1322,8 +1323,8 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
>>             AcpiPmInfo *pm, AcpiMiscInfo *misc,
>>             Range *pci_hole, Range *pci_hole64, MachineState *machine)
>>  {
>> -    Object *piix = object_resolve_type_unambiguous(TYPE_PIIX4_PM);
>> -    Object *lpc = object_resolve_type_unambiguous(TYPE_ICH9_LPC_DEVICE);
>> +    Object *i440fx = 
>> object_resolve_type_unambiguous(TYPE_I440FX_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE);
>> +    Object *q35 = object_resolve_type_unambiguous(TYPE_Q35_HOST_DEVICE);
>>      CrsRangeEntry *entry;
>>      Aml *dsdt, *sb_scope, *scope, *dev, *method, *field, *pkg, *crs;
>>      CrsRangeSet crs_range_set;
>> @@ -1344,13 +1345,13 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
>>      AcpiTable table = { .sig = "DSDT", .rev = 1, .oem_id = x86ms->oem_id,
>>                          .oem_table_id = x86ms->oem_table_id };
>>
>> -    assert(!!piix != !!lpc);
>> +    assert(!!i440fx != !!q35);
>>
>>      acpi_table_begin(&table, table_data);
>>      dsdt = init_aml_allocator();
>>
>>      build_dbg_aml(dsdt);
>> -    if (piix) {
>> +    if (i440fx) {
>>          sb_scope = aml_scope("_SB");
>>          dev = aml_device("PCI0");
>>          aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_HID", aml_eisaid("PNP0A03")));
>> @@ -1363,7 +1364,7 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
>>              build_x86_acpi_pci_hotplug(dsdt, pm->pcihp_io_base);
>>          }
>>          build_piix4_pci0_int(dsdt);
>> -    } else if (lpc) {
>> +    } else if (q35) {
>>          sb_scope = aml_scope("_SB");
>>          dev = aml_device("PCI0");
>>          aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_HID", aml_eisaid("PNP0A08")));
>> --
>> 2.38.1
>>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]