qemu-trivial
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] softmmu/device_tree: Silence compiler warning with --enable-


From: Alistair Francis
Subject: Re: [PATCH] softmmu/device_tree: Silence compiler warning with --enable-sanitizers
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 16:39:47 +1000

On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 11:41 PM Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> If I configure my build with --enable-sanitizers, my GCC (v8.5.0)
> complains:
>
> .../softmmu/device_tree.c: In function ‘qemu_fdt_add_path’:
> .../softmmu/device_tree.c:560:18: error: ‘retval’ may be used uninitialized
>  in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
>      int namelen, retval;
>                   ^~~~~~
>
> It's a false warning since the while loop is always executed at least
> once (p has to be non-NULL, otherwise the derefence in the if-statement
> earlier will crash). Thus let's switch to a do-while loop here instead
> to make the compiler happy in all cases.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>

Thanks!

Applied to riscv-to-apply.next

If anyone else (trivial maybe?) wants to take this feel free to as
well, otherwise I'll just take this via the RISC-V tree.

Alistair

> ---
>  softmmu/device_tree.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/softmmu/device_tree.c b/softmmu/device_tree.c
> index 3965c834ca..9e96f5ecd5 100644
> --- a/softmmu/device_tree.c
> +++ b/softmmu/device_tree.c
> @@ -564,7 +564,7 @@ int qemu_fdt_add_path(void *fdt, const char *path)
>          return -1;
>      }
>
> -    while (p) {
> +    do {
>          name = p + 1;
>          p = strchr(name, '/');
>          namelen = p != NULL ? p - name : strlen(name);
> @@ -584,7 +584,7 @@ int qemu_fdt_add_path(void *fdt, const char *path)
>          }
>
>          parent = retval;
> -    }
> +    } while (p);
>
>      return retval;
>  }
> --
> 2.27.0
>
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]