Re: [PATCH v0] kvm: unsigned datatype in ioctl wrapper

[Johannes S]

On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 10:15 PM Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
> I think I would vote for following the type used by the ioctl()
> function as declared in the headers for both Linux and the BSDs,
> and using 'unsigned long'.
> (We should change KVMState::irq_set_ioctl too, to match.)

I would agree to 'unsigned long', in that case I can generate a new patch.

And in theory if all libc implementations specify the ioctl request as
'int' we could go back to 'int'.

Johannes