qemu-trivial
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [QEMU PATCH] MAINTAINERS: D


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [QEMU PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Downgrade status of block sections without "M:" to "Odd Fixes"
Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 12:09:55 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1

On 06/05/2019 09.48, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
> 
> On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 08:18:54AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> Fixes might still get picked up via the qemu-block mailing list,
>> so the status is not "Orphan" yet.
>> Also add the gluster mailing list as suggested by Niels here:
>>
>>  https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10613297/#22409943
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  MAINTAINERS | 5 +++--
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>> index 66ddbda9c9..899a4cd572 100644
>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> @@ -2404,12 +2404,13 @@ F: block/ssh.c
>>  
>>  CURL
>>  L: address@hidden
>> -S: Supported
>> +S: Odd Fixes
>>  F: block/curl.c
>>  
>>  GLUSTER
>>  L: address@hidden
>> -S: Supported
>> +L: address@hidden
>> +S: Odd Fixes
>>  F: block/gluster.c
> 
> I'm currently trying to get more experience on Gluster (and also on RBD).
> I'd add myself as a reviewer since I'm trying to review all patches in these
> areas and I'm working on some fixes.
> I could also become a maintainer, but I'm not sure I have the right experience
> you want.
> 
> Should I send a new patch to add myself as reviewer (or maintainer)?

Yes, I think it's best if you send a separate patch for this, so that it
also has a proper "Signed-off-by" line in the changelog history later.

 Thomas



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]