[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/9] cpu/topology: add general su
From: |
Eduardo Habkost |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/9] cpu/topology: add general support for machine properties |
Date: |
Thu, 2 May 2019 22:08:04 -0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) |
On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 05:09:28PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 15:30:31 +0800
> Like Xu <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > On 2019/4/4 22:25, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 16:48:38 +0800
> > > Like Xu <address@hidden> wrote:
> > >
>
> [...]
>
> >
> > The division of responsibility for this case (refactoring
> > qemu_init_vcpu) seems to be a poisonous apple.
> >
> > The prerequisite for setting cpu-> nr_cores / nr_threads from the parent
> > is that the CPU has been created, so if any process during
> > initialization needs this topo information, it will use the default
> > values form cpu_common_initfn() instead of user-configured parameters.
>
> can you point to concrete place that needs access to nr_cores / nr_threads
> before cpu is 'realized'?
We have very few architectures actually using
nr_cores/nr_threads/smp_cores/smp_threads. I think those
variables are used only on x86, ppc, and mips.
I believe I suggested some time ago that we should get rid of the
nr_cores/nr_threads CPUState fields and move them to
arch-specific types. This would help us avoid confusion when
different architectures have different semantics for
nr_cores/nr_threads.
See https://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg587105.html
("[Qemu-devel] Meaning of '-smp threads' on mips_malta") for one
example of confusing arch-specific semantics.
--
Eduardo