[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1] configure: require glib-2.24

From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1] configure: require glib-2.24
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 11:19:07 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0

On 26.04.2018 10:17, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 18 April 2018 at 15:44, Daniel P. Berrangé <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 02:29:47PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> Yes, my OSX build system is on glib 2.22. It's using 'fink' for 3rd
>>> party library installations, and they somehow seem to have got stuck
>>> on 2.22. Looking at the website the project seems to have basically
>>> stagnated, and I guess I need to move to homebrew at some point
>>> (likely after we get 2.12 out the door). But for the moment this
>>> patch would break my pullrequest testing builds.
>> Yeah that sounds reasonable as it would also align your build env with
>> what we are testing via travis too.
> I've now made the switch to homebrew, and so my OSX build tests
> will be using glib 2.56. NB that this means that none of my merge
> testing will catch "glib version too old" for our current setting
> of "too old" -- I'm not sure what my current oldest version is in
> the test machine set.
> I've also upgraded Xcode, which means I now have a machine with
> a clang that emits all the -Waddress-of-packed-member complaints.
> I have configured the test build so those aren't fatal
> (via --extra-cflags='-Werror -Wno-error=address-of-packed-member
> -Wno-error=deprecated-declarations') but I'm now more interested in
> getting those cleaned up so they don't clutter up my logfiles :-)

Isn't the -Wno-error=address-of-packed-members flag added by Gerd's
patch already? See:



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]