qemu-trivial
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 88/88] scripts/coverity-model: us


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 88/88] scripts/coverity-model: use g_new() family of functions
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 01:11:36 -0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0

Hi Markus,

On 10/09/2017 03:46 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Please cc me on changes to stuff I maintain, as scripts/get_maintainer
> tells you :)

Oops I might have been a copy/paste error.

> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden> writes:
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  scripts/coverity-model.c | 2 +-
[...]
>>  GIOChannel *g_io_channel_unix_new(int fd)
>>  {
>> -    GIOChannel *c = g_malloc0(sizeof(GIOChannel));
>> +    GIOChannel *c = g_new0(GIOChannel, 1);
>>      __coverity_escape__(fd);
>>      return c;
>>  }
> 
> Hmm.
> 
> The Coverity model carefully explains g_malloc0().  It doesn't explain
> g_new0().  With any luck, Coverity can see through g_new0() --- it's a
> macro in my <gmem.h>.  But why complicate matters?  The normal reason
> for changing g_malloc0() to g_new0() doesn't apply here.  Let's leave
> the model alone.

Yes you are right.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]