qemu-stable
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] Fixes for DP8393X SONIC device emulation


From: Laurent Vivier
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] Fixes for DP8393X SONIC device emulation
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 11:16:04 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.1

Le 20/12/2019 à 05:17, Finn Thain a écrit :
> Hi All,
> 
> There are bugs in the DP8393X emulation that can stop packet reception.
> 
> Whilst debugging the device I found that the receiver algorithm differs
> from the one described in the National Semiconductor datasheet.
> 
> These issues and others are addressed by this patch series.
> 
> This series has only been tested with Linux/m68k guests. It needs further
> testing with MIPS Magnum guests such as NetBSD or Windows NT.
> 
> Note that the mainline Linux sonic driver also has bugs.
> Those bugs have been fixed in a series of patches at,
> https://github.com/fthain/linux/commits/mac68k
> 
> ---
> Changed since v1:
>  - Minor revisions described in patch descriptions.
>  - Dropped patches 4/10 and 7/10.
>  - Added 5 new patches.
> 
> 
> Finn Thain (13):
>   dp8393x: Mask EOL bit from descriptor addresses
>   dp8393x: Clean up endianness hacks
>   dp8393x: Have dp8393x_receive() return the packet size
>   dp8393x: Update LLFA and CRDA registers from rx descriptor
>   dp8393x: Clear RRRA command register bit only when appropriate
>   dp8393x: Implement packet size limit and RBAE interrupt
>   dp8393x: Don't stop reception upon RBE interrupt assertion
>   dp8393x: Don't clobber packet checksum
>   dp8393x: Use long-word-aligned RRA pointers in 32-bit mode
>   dp8393x: Pad frames to word or long word boundary
>   dp8393x: Clear descriptor in_use field when necessary
>   dp8393x: Always update RRA pointers and sequence numbers
>   dp8393x: Correctly advance RRP
> 
>  hw/net/dp8393x.c | 147 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 100 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
> 

For q800:

Tested-by: Laurent Vivier <address@hidden>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]