Re: [Qemu-stable] a svvp bug related question

[Yan Vugenfirer]

> On 27 Sep 2016, at 12:23, Vadim Rozenfeld <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> I'm just wondering if "-rtc base=localtime,clock=host,driftfix=slew" 
> is what we usually use for svvp testing.

I don’t think we used "driftfix=slew” last time.

> 
> Best regards,
> Vadim.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Yan Vugenfirer" <address@hidden>
> To: "Vadim Rozenfeld" <address@hidden>
> Cc: "Paolo Bonzini" <address@hidden>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 7:08:44 PM
> Subject: Re: a svvp bug related question
> 
> Yes.
> 
> “Interrupt profiling” test was failing and then Paolo suggested to adjust the 
> minimal timer for KVM to 100ns. It looks that on Intel platforms it was 
> enough.
> 
> The SVVP test log also show the deltas it worth looking at it,
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Yan.
> 
>> On 27 Sep 2016, at 12:02, Vadim Rozenfeld <address@hidden> wrote:
>> 
>> Sorry, here it is.
>> 
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378005
>> 
>> 
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Yan Vugenfirer" <address@hidden>
>> To: "Vadim Rozenfeld" <address@hidden>
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 6:48:47 PM
>> Subject: Re: a svvp bug related question
>> 
>> Hi Vadim,
>> 
>> I get invalid bug ID.
>> 
>> Can you please resend the link?
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Yan.
>>> On 27 Sep 2016, at 11:47, Vadim Rozenfeld <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Yan,
>>> 
>>> Could you please take a look at the following problem?
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=13780
>>> 
>>> Does it look familiar?
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Vadim.
>> 
>