qemu-s390x
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v1 1/5] meson: Introduce target-specific Kconfig


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/5] meson: Introduce target-specific Kconfig
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 14:47:56 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0

On 7/6/21 12:52 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 21/06/2021 17.21, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
>>
>> Add a target-specific Kconfig. We need the definitions in Kconfig so
>> the minikconf tool can verify they exit. However CONFIG_FOO is only
> 
> s/exit/exist/ ?
> 
>> enabled for target foo via the meson.build rules.
>>
>> Two architecture have a particularity, ARM and MIPS:
>> their 64-bit version include the 32-bit subset.
> 
> Why do you mention these here, but not x86, Sparc, PPC and RISC-V which
> also have 32-bit and 64-bit variants?

Because we consider them as different targets, they don't include
(kselect) the subset.

> 
> The patch itself looks fine to me, so once you've clarified the commit
> message:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> 
> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
>> Message-Id: <20210131111316.232778-6-f4bug@amsat.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
>>
>> ---
>> vajb:
>>    - removed targets that no longer exist
>>    - reword commit message to show why we need the Kconfigs
>> ---

>> diff --git a/target/arm/Kconfig b/target/arm/Kconfig
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000..3f3394a22b
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/target/arm/Kconfig
>> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
>> +config ARM
>> +    bool
>> +
>> +config AARCH64
>> +    bool
>> +    select ARM

>> diff --git a/target/mips/Kconfig b/target/mips/Kconfig
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000..6adf145354
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/target/mips/Kconfig
>> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
>> +config MIPS
>> +    bool
>> +
>> +config MIPS64
>> +    bool
>> +    select MIPS



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]