[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] intc/i8259: avoid (false positive) gcc warning
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] intc/i8259: avoid (false positive) gcc warning |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Mar 2021 17:03:02 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0 |
On 18/03/21 16:47, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
some copiler versions are smart enough to detect a potentially
uninitialized variable, but are not smart enough to detect that this
cannot happen due to the code flow:
../hw/intc/i8259.c: In function ‘pic_read_irq’:
../hw/intc/i8259.c:203:13: error: ‘irq2’ may be used uninitialized in this
function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
203 | irq = irq2 + 8;
| ~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
Let us initialize irq2 to -1 to avoid this warning as the most simple
solution.
What about:
diff --git a/hw/intc/i8259.c b/hw/intc/i8259.c
index 344fd04db1..bf28c179de 100644
--- a/hw/intc/i8259.c
+++ b/hw/intc/i8259.c
@@ -189,20 +189,18 @@ int pic_read_irq(DeviceState *d)
irq2 = 7;
}
intno = slave_pic->irq_base + irq2;
+ irq = irq2 + 8;
+ pic_intack(s, 2);
} else {
intno = s->irq_base + irq;
+ pic_intack(s, irq);
}
- pic_intack(s, irq);
} else {
/* spurious IRQ on host controller */
irq = 7;
intno = s->irq_base + irq;
}
- if (irq == 2) {
- irq = irq2 + 8;
- }
-
#ifdef DEBUG_IRQ_LATENCY
printf("IRQ%d latency=%0.3fus\n",
irq,
?
Paolo