qemu-s390x
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] intc/i8259: avoid (false positive) gcc warning


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [PATCH] intc/i8259: avoid (false positive) gcc warning
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 17:03:02 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0

On 18/03/21 16:47, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
some copiler versions are smart enough to detect a potentially
uninitialized variable, but are not smart enough to detect that this
cannot happen due to the code flow:

../hw/intc/i8259.c: In function ‘pic_read_irq’:
../hw/intc/i8259.c:203:13: error: ‘irq2’ may be used uninitialized in this 
function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
    203 |         irq = irq2 + 8;
        |         ~~~~^~~~~~~~~~

Let us initialize irq2 to -1 to avoid this warning as the most simple
solution.

What about:

diff --git a/hw/intc/i8259.c b/hw/intc/i8259.c
index 344fd04db1..bf28c179de 100644
--- a/hw/intc/i8259.c
+++ b/hw/intc/i8259.c
@@ -189,20 +189,18 @@ int pic_read_irq(DeviceState *d)
                 irq2 = 7;
             }
             intno = slave_pic->irq_base + irq2;
+            irq = irq2 + 8;
+            pic_intack(s, 2);
         } else {
             intno = s->irq_base + irq;
+            pic_intack(s, irq);
         }
-        pic_intack(s, irq);
     } else {
         /* spurious IRQ on host controller */
         irq = 7;
         intno = s->irq_base + irq;
     }

-    if (irq == 2) {
-        irq = irq2 + 8;
-    }
-
 #ifdef DEBUG_IRQ_LATENCY
     printf("IRQ%d latency=%0.3fus\n",
            irq,


?

Paolo




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]