The current EXRL tests crash on real machines: we must not use r0 as a base
register for trt/trtr, otherwise the content gets ignored. Also, we must
not use r0 for exrl, otherwise it gets ignored.
Let's use the "a" constraint so we get a general purpose register != r0.
For op2, we can simply specify a memory operand directly via "Q" (Memory
reference without index register and with short displacement).
Fixes: ad8c851d2e77 ("target/s390x: add EX support for TRT and TRTR")
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
tests/tcg/s390x/exrl-trt.c | 8 ++++----
tests/tcg/s390x/exrl-trtr.c | 8 ++++----
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/tcg/s390x/exrl-trt.c b/tests/tcg/s390x/exrl-trt.c
index 3c5323aecb..16711a3181 100644
--- a/tests/tcg/s390x/exrl-trt.c
+++ b/tests/tcg/s390x/exrl-trt.c
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ int main(void)
}
asm volatile(
" j 2f\n"
- "1: trt 0(1,%[op1]),0(%[op2])\n"
+ "1: trt 0(1,%[op1]),%[op2]\n"
"2: exrl %[op1_len],1b\n"
" lgr %[r1],%%r1\n"
" lgr %[r2],%%r2\n"
@@ -27,9 +27,9 @@ int main(void)
: [r1] "+r" (r1),
[r2] "+r" (r2),
[cc] "=r" (cc)
- : [op1] "r" (&op1),
- [op1_len] "r" (5),
- [op2] "r" (&op2)
+ : [op1] "a" (&op1),
+ [op1_len] "a" (5),