[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] hw/watchdog/wdt_diag288: Remove unnecessary includes
From: |
Markus Armbruster |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] hw/watchdog/wdt_diag288: Remove unnecessary includes |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Nov 2020 11:47:25 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) |
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> writes:
> On 18/11/2020 15.30, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 at 14:24, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> On 11/18/20 10:03 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>>>> Both headers, sysbus.h and module.h, are not required to compile this
>>>>> file.
>>>
>>> module.h is: it defines type_init().
>>
>>>>> #include "qemu/timer.h"
>>>>> #include "hw/watchdog/wdt_diag288.h"
>>>>> #include "migration/vmstate.h"
>>>>> #include "qemu/log.h"
>>>>> -#include "qemu/module.h"
>>>>
>>>> Cc'ing Markus because of:
>>
>>>> Include qemu/module.h where needed, drop it from qemu-common.h
>>>
>>> If it still compiles and links, it must get it via some other header.
>>
>> Yes: wdt_diag288.c -> include/hw/watchdog/wdt_diag288.h ->
>> include/qom/object.h -> include/qemu/module.h
>
> So what's now our expectation here? Should every file that uses type_init()
> also include module.h ? That's IMHO not very intuitive...
> Or are we fine that type_init() is provided by qom/object.h which needs to
> be pulled in by every device sooner or later anyway?
I think it's okay to rely on indirect inclusion.
- [PATCH] hw/watchdog/wdt_diag288: Remove unnecessary includes, Thomas Huth, 2020/11/18
- Re: [PATCH] hw/watchdog/wdt_diag288: Remove unnecessary includes, Christian Borntraeger, 2020/11/18
- Re: [PATCH] hw/watchdog/wdt_diag288: Remove unnecessary includes, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2020/11/18
- Re: [PATCH] hw/watchdog/wdt_diag288: Remove unnecessary includes, Markus Armbruster, 2020/11/18
- Re: [PATCH] hw/watchdog/wdt_diag288: Remove unnecessary includes, Peter Maydell, 2020/11/18
- Re: [PATCH] hw/watchdog/wdt_diag288: Remove unnecessary includes, Thomas Huth, 2020/11/23
- Re: [PATCH] hw/watchdog/wdt_diag288: Remove unnecessary includes,
Markus Armbruster <=
- Re: [PATCH] hw/watchdog/wdt_diag288: Remove unnecessary includes, Cornelia Huck, 2020/11/23
- Re: [PATCH] hw/watchdog/wdt_diag288: Remove unnecessary includes, Thomas Huth, 2020/11/23
- Re: [PATCH] hw/watchdog/wdt_diag288: Remove unnecessary includes, Cornelia Huck, 2020/11/24
Re: [PATCH] hw/watchdog/wdt_diag288: Remove unnecessary includes, Cornelia Huck, 2020/11/24