qemu-s390x
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[PATCH v1 17/21] target/s390x: add BQL to do_interrupt and cpu_exec_inte


From: Robert Foley
Subject: [PATCH v1 17/21] target/s390x: add BQL to do_interrupt and cpu_exec_interrupt
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 14:12:59 -0400

This is part of a series of changes to remove the implied BQL
from the common code of cpu_handle_interrupt and
cpu_handle_exception.  As part of removing the implied BQL
from the common code, we are pushing the BQL holding
down into the per-arch implementation functions of
do_interrupt and cpu_exec_interrupt.

The purpose of this set of changes is to set the groundwork
so that an arch could move towards removing
the BQL from the cpu_handle_interrupt/exception paths.

This approach was suggested by Paolo Bonzini.
For reference, here are two key posts in the discussion, explaining
the reasoning/benefits of this approach.
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-07/msg08731.html
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-08/msg00044.html

Signed-off-by: Robert Foley <robert.foley@linaro.org>
---
 target/s390x/excp_helper.c | 12 +++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/target/s390x/excp_helper.c b/target/s390x/excp_helper.c
index dde7afc2f0..b215b4a4a7 100644
--- a/target/s390x/excp_helper.c
+++ b/target/s390x/excp_helper.c
@@ -470,7 +470,10 @@ void s390_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)
     S390CPU *cpu = S390_CPU(cs);
     CPUS390XState *env = &cpu->env;
     bool stopped = false;
-
+    bool bql = !qemu_mutex_iothread_locked();
+    if (bql) {
+        qemu_mutex_lock_iothread();
+    }
     qemu_log_mask(CPU_LOG_INT, "%s: %d at psw=%" PRIx64 ":%" PRIx64 "\n",
                   __func__, cs->exception_index, env->psw.mask, env->psw.addr);
 
@@ -541,10 +544,14 @@ try_deliver:
         /* unhalt if we had a WAIT PSW somehwere in our injection chain */
         s390_cpu_unhalt(cpu);
     }
+    if (bql) {
+        qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
+    }
 }
 
 bool s390_cpu_exec_interrupt(CPUState *cs, int interrupt_request)
 {
+    qemu_mutex_lock_iothread();
     if (interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD) {
         S390CPU *cpu = S390_CPU(cs);
         CPUS390XState *env = &cpu->env;
@@ -552,10 +559,12 @@ bool s390_cpu_exec_interrupt(CPUState *cs, int 
interrupt_request)
         if (env->ex_value) {
             /* Execution of the target insn is indivisible from
                the parent EXECUTE insn.  */
+            qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
             return false;
         }
         if (s390_cpu_has_int(cpu)) {
             s390_cpu_do_interrupt(cs);
+            qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
             return true;
         }
         if (env->psw.mask & PSW_MASK_WAIT) {
@@ -564,6 +573,7 @@ bool s390_cpu_exec_interrupt(CPUState *cs, int 
interrupt_request)
             cpu_interrupt(CPU(cpu), CPU_INTERRUPT_HALT);
         }
     }
+    qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
     return false;
 }
 
-- 
2.17.1




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]