qemu-s390x
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH for-5.2 2/6] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Move ipl-related code from mai


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-5.2 2/6] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Move ipl-related code from main() into a separate function
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 13:05:08 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0

On 29/07/2020 10.47, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 20:37:30 +0200
> Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>> Let's move this part of the code into a separate function to be able
>> to use it from multiple spots later.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/main.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
>>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/main.c b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/main.c
>> index 146a50760b..9b64eb0c24 100644
>> --- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/main.c
>> +++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/main.c
>> @@ -223,14 +223,8 @@ static void virtio_setup(void)
>>      }
>>  }
>>  
>> -int main(void)
>> +static void ipl_boot_device(void)
>>  {
>> -    sclp_setup();
>> -    css_setup();
>> -    boot_setup();
>> -    find_boot_device();
>> -    enable_subchannel(blk_schid);
>> -
>>      switch (cutype) {
>>      case CU_TYPE_DASD_3990:
>>      case CU_TYPE_DASD_2107:
>> @@ -242,8 +236,18 @@ int main(void)
>>          break;
>>      default:
>>          print_int("Attempting to boot from unexpected device type", cutype);
>> -        panic("");
>> +        panic("\nBoot failed.\n");
> 
> Maybe "Boot failed: no supported device type"?

The print_int right before already talks about "unexpected device type",
so I think the simple "Boot failed" should be enough?

>>      }
>> +}
>> +
>> +int main(void)
>> +{
>> +    sclp_setup();
>> +    css_setup();
>> +    boot_setup();
>> +    find_boot_device();
>> +    enable_subchannel(blk_schid);
>> +    ipl_boot_device();
>>  
>>      panic("Failed to load OS from hard disk\n");
>>      return 0; /* make compiler happy */
> 
> Anyway,
> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>

Thanks!

 Thomas




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]