qemu-s390x
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v2 10/10] s390x/cpumodel: wire up 8561 and 8562


From: Christian Borntraeger
Subject: Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v2 10/10] s390x/cpumodel: wire up 8561 and 8562 as gen15 machines
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 14:01:24 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1


On 26.04.19 13:52, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 26.04.19 13:36, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 26.04.19 13:32, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> On 26.04.19 13:10, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>>> 8561 and 8562 will be gen15 machines. There is no name yet, lets us use
>>>> the cpu id as base name. Later on we can provide aliases with the proper
>>>> name.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <address@hidden>
>>>> ---
>>>>  target/s390x/cpu_models.c | 2 ++
>>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu_models.c b/target/s390x/cpu_models.c
>>>> index d683635eb5..dd6415103f 100644
>>>> --- a/target/s390x/cpu_models.c
>>>> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu_models.c
>>>> @@ -83,6 +83,8 @@ static S390CPUDef s390_cpu_defs[] = {
>>>>      CPUDEF_INIT(0x3906, 14, 1, 47, 0x08000000U, "z14", "IBM z14 GA1"),
>>>>      CPUDEF_INIT(0x3906, 14, 2, 47, 0x08000000U, "z14.2", "IBM z14 GA2"),
>>>>      CPUDEF_INIT(0x3907, 14, 1, 47, 0x08000000U, "z14ZR1", "IBM z14 Model 
>>>> ZR1 GA1"),
>>>> +    CPUDEF_INIT(0x8561, 15, 1, 47, 0x08000000U, "8561", "IBM 8561 GA1"),
>>>> +    CPUDEF_INIT(0x8562, 15, 1, 47, 0x08000000U, "8562", "IBM 8562 GA1"),
>>>>  };
>>>
>>> Thinking out loud, I know that official names are not published yet.
>>> Looking at the recent history (z13, z14), my educated guess would be
>>> z15. I guess pretty much everybody would guess that.
>>
>> Not sure about trademark aspects - especially if this really becomes z15. 
>> The smaller
>> machine has no real history (ZR1 vs. s vs BC). So I think I would rather 
>> have a correct
>> number than a partially correct name.
> 
> We could also use "gen15a" and "gen15b", still better to get than magic
> numbers. (yeah well, they are not magic)
> 
> If you want to stick with numbers, be aware that cpu numbers are not
> injective, so at some point we will need e.g. "8561.2", just so you're
> aware of the implications.

I think whatever we have here is only used internally for expansion (host-model)
and the user will use later the real name when available. (custom). So probably 
this
does not matter for a long time. But I might be wrong.
I tend to prefer gen15 over z15 but 856x has also its charm.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]