Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v2] s390x: express dependencies with Kconfig

[Yang Zhong]

On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 11:07:19AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 29/01/19 10:49, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 10:42:14 +0100
> > Thomas Huth <address@hidden> wrote:
> > 
> >> Instead of hard-coding all config switches in the config file
> >> default-configs/s390x-softmmu.mak, let's use the new Kconfig files
> >> to express the necessary dependencies: The S390_CCW_VIRTIO config switch
> >> for the "s390-ccw-virtio" machine now selects all non-optional devices.
> >>
> >> And since we already have the VIRTIO_PCI and VIRTIO_MMIO config switches
> >> for the other two virtio transports, this patch also introduces a new
> >> config switch VIRTIO_CCW for the third, s390x-specific virtio transport,
> >> so that all three virtio transports are now handled in the same way.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>
> >> ---
> >>  v2:
> >>  - Use CONFIG_TERMINAL3270 for 3270-ccw.o
> >>  - Use CONFIG_VIRTIO_CCW for all related devices in the Makefile
> >>
> >>  default-configs/s390x-softmmu.mak | 12 ++++++++----
> >>  hw/s390x/Kconfig                  |  4 ++++
> >>  hw/s390x/Makefile.objs            |  4 +++-
> >>  hw/virtio/Kconfig                 |  4 ++++
> >>  4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Looks sane to me.
> > 
> > As I have not looked into the Kconfig infrastructure, I don't feel
> > comfortable enough to give a R-b, but have a
> > 
> > Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <address@hidden>
> > 
> 
> Thanks.  Yang, can you integrate it into the next version?
> 
  Yes, i will integrate this patch into Kconfig series patches. thanks all!

  Regards,

  Yang

> Paolo