qemu-s390x
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH] include/fpu/softfloat: Fix compilation with Cla


From: Cornelia Huck
Subject: Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH] include/fpu/softfloat: Fix compilation with Clang on s390x
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 17:50:14 +0100

On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 13:12:35 +0100
Thomas Huth <address@hidden> wrote:

> Clang v7.0.1 does not like the __int128 variable type for inline
> assembly on s390x:
> 
> In file included from fpu/softfloat.c:97:
> include/fpu/softfloat-macros.h:647:9: error: inline asm error:
>  This value type register class is not natively supported!
>     asm("dlgr %0, %1" : "+r"(n) : "r"(d));
>         ^
> 
> Disable this code part there now when compiling with Clang, so that
> the generic code gets used instead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>
> ---
>  include/fpu/softfloat-macros.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/fpu/softfloat-macros.h b/include/fpu/softfloat-macros.h
> index b1d772e..bd5b641 100644
> --- a/include/fpu/softfloat-macros.h
> +++ b/include/fpu/softfloat-macros.h
> @@ -641,7 +641,7 @@ static inline uint64_t udiv_qrnnd(uint64_t *r, uint64_t 
> n1,
>      uint64_t q;
>      asm("divq %4" : "=a"(q), "=d"(*r) : "0"(n0), "1"(n1), "rm"(d));
>      return q;
> -#elif defined(__s390x__)
> +#elif defined(__s390x__) && !defined(__clang__)
>      /* Need to use a TImode type to get an even register pair for DLGR.  */
>      unsigned __int128 n = (unsigned __int128)n1 << 64 | n0;
>      asm("dlgr %0, %1" : "+r"(n) : "r"(d));

Ok, so what's the deal with this patch now? Fix compilation now,
optimize later?

If yes, should I pick it as an s390x build fix (I plan to send a pull
request later this week), or will the fpu maintainers pick it?



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]