[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node
From: |
David Gibson |
Subject: |
Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Jun 2018 18:20:58 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.9.5 (2018-04-13) |
On Fri, Jun 08, 2018 at 09:46:57AM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 09:42:48 +0200
> David Hildenbrand <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > On 08.06.2018 09:34, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > > On Thu, 7 Jun 2018 18:52:12 +0200
> > > David Hildenbrand <address@hidden> wrote:
> > >
> > >> The node property can always be queried and the value has already been
> > >> verified in pc_dimm_realize().
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <address@hidden>
> > >> ---
> > >> hw/ppc/spapr.c | 9 +--------
> > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> > >> index 2375cbee12..d038f3243e 100644
> > >> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> > >> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> > >> @@ -3578,14 +3578,7 @@ static void
> > >> spapr_machine_device_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
> > >> error_setg(errp, "Memory hotplug not supported for this
> > >> machine");
> > >> return;
> > >> }
> > >> - node = object_property_get_uint(OBJECT(dev), PC_DIMM_NODE_PROP,
> > >> errp);
> > >> - if (*errp) {
> > >
> > > Good riddance :)
> > >
> > >> - return;
> > >> - }
> > >> - if (node < 0 || node >= MAX_NODES) {
> > >> - error_setg(errp, "Invaild node %d", node);
> > >> - return;
> > >> - }
> > >> + node = object_property_get_uint(OBJECT(dev), PC_DIMM_NODE_PROP,
> > >> NULL);
> > >
> > > Maybe pass &error_abort ?
> >
> > I'm using the same access scheme as in hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.c
> >
> > ("error ignored" vs. "error leads to an abort") - but this will actually
> > never fail. But I can use error_abort here, does not matter.
> >
>
> Heh, /me paranoid but this is David's call and he acked that already
> so I guess it's okay.
Actually, I missed this - error_abort is preferable. That's general
the right choice for things that shouldn't ever fail. This way if
they *do* fail we get a clear error immediately.
> Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <address@hidden>
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node, (continued)
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node, David Hildenbrand, 2018/06/08
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node, Thomas Huth, 2018/06/08
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node, Igor Mammedov, 2018/06/08
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node, David Hildenbrand, 2018/06/08
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node, Igor Mammedov, 2018/06/08
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node, David Hildenbrand, 2018/06/08
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node, Greg Kurz, 2018/06/08
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node, David Hildenbrand, 2018/06/08
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node, Cornelia Huck, 2018/06/08
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node, Greg Kurz, 2018/06/08
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node,
David Gibson <=
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node, David Hildenbrand, 2018/06/08
[qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 3/8] spapr: move all DIMM checks into spapr_memory_plug, David Hildenbrand, 2018/06/07
[qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 5/8] spapr: introduce machine unplug handler, David Hildenbrand, 2018/06/07