[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node
From: |
David Hildenbrand |
Subject: |
Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Jun 2018 09:42:48 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 |
On 08.06.2018 09:34, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jun 2018 18:52:12 +0200
> David Hildenbrand <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> The node property can always be queried and the value has already been
>> verified in pc_dimm_realize().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <address@hidden>
>> ---
>> hw/ppc/spapr.c | 9 +--------
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
>> index 2375cbee12..d038f3243e 100644
>> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
>> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
>> @@ -3578,14 +3578,7 @@ static void spapr_machine_device_plug(HotplugHandler
>> *hotplug_dev,
>> error_setg(errp, "Memory hotplug not supported for this
>> machine");
>> return;
>> }
>> - node = object_property_get_uint(OBJECT(dev), PC_DIMM_NODE_PROP,
>> errp);
>> - if (*errp) {
>
> Good riddance :)
>
>> - return;
>> - }
>> - if (node < 0 || node >= MAX_NODES) {
>> - error_setg(errp, "Invaild node %d", node);
>> - return;
>> - }
>> + node = object_property_get_uint(OBJECT(dev), PC_DIMM_NODE_PROP,
>> NULL);
>
> Maybe pass &error_abort ?
I'm using the same access scheme as in hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.c
("error ignored" vs. "error leads to an abort") - but this will actually
never fail. But I can use error_abort here, does not matter.
Thanks!
>
>>
>> spapr_memory_plug(hotplug_dev, dev, node, errp);
>> } else if (object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(dev), TYPE_SPAPR_CPU_CORE)) {
>
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
- [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 0/8] pc/spapr/s390x: machine hotplug handler cleanups, David Hildenbrand, 2018/06/07
- [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 1/8] pc: local error handling in hotplug handler functions, David Hildenbrand, 2018/06/07
- [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node, David Hildenbrand, 2018/06/07
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node, David Gibson, 2018/06/08
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node, Greg Kurz, 2018/06/08
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node,
David Hildenbrand <=
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node, Greg Kurz, 2018/06/08
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node, David Hildenbrand, 2018/06/08
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node, Thomas Huth, 2018/06/08
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node, Igor Mammedov, 2018/06/08
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node, David Hildenbrand, 2018/06/08
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node, Igor Mammedov, 2018/06/08
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node, David Hildenbrand, 2018/06/08
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node, Greg Kurz, 2018/06/08
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node, David Hildenbrand, 2018/06/08
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 2/8] spapr: no need to verify the node, Cornelia Huck, 2018/06/08