On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 9:46 AM Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org
<mailto:richard.henderson@linaro.org>> wrote:
On 9/6/22 13:22, Christoph Muellner wrote:
> + DEFINE_CPU(TYPE_RISCV_CPU_THEAD_C906,
rv64_thead_c906_cpu_init),
> + DEFINE_CPU(TYPE_RISCV_CPU_THEAD_C910,
rv64_thead_c906_cpu_init),
Why model both if they're identical?
I figured that users might expect that (existence of "thead-c906" and
"thead-c910").
And using "thead-c9xx" feels like it would be regretted in the future.
Should I drop "thead-c910"?