qemu-riscv
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/2] hw/riscv: sifive_u: Add write-once protection.


From: Bin Meng
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/2] hw/riscv: sifive_u: Add write-once protection.
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 10:39:24 +0800

On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 1:09 AM Green Wan <green.wan@sifive.com> wrote:
>
> Add array to store the 'written' status for all bit of OTP to block
> the write operation to the same bit. Ignore the control register
> offset from 0x0 to 0x38 of OTP memory mapping.

nits: please remove the ending period in the commit title

>
> Signed-off-by: Green Wan <green.wan@sifive.com>
> ---
>  hw/riscv/sifive_u_otp.c         | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/hw/riscv/sifive_u_otp.h |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/riscv/sifive_u_otp.c b/hw/riscv/sifive_u_otp.c
> index 4552b2409e..3a25652735 100644
> --- a/hw/riscv/sifive_u_otp.c
> +++ b/hw/riscv/sifive_u_otp.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,12 @@
>  #include "sysemu/blockdev.h"
>  #include "sysemu/block-backend.h"
>
> +#define SET_WRITTEN_BIT(map, idx, bit)    \
> +    (map[idx] |= (0x1 << bit))
> +
> +#define GET_WRITTEN_BIT(map, idx, bit)    \
> +    ((map[idx] >> bit) & 0x1)
> +
>  static uint64_t sifive_u_otp_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, unsigned int 
> size)
>  {
>      SiFiveUOTPState *s = opaque;
> @@ -135,6 +141,18 @@ static void sifive_u_otp_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
>          s->ptrim = val32;
>          break;
>      case SIFIVE_U_OTP_PWE:
> +        /* Keep written state for data only and PWE is enabled. Ignore PAS=1 
> */
> +        if ((s->pa > SIFIVE_U_OTP_PWE) && (val32 & 0x1) && !s->pas) {
> +            if (GET_WRITTEN_BIT(s->fuse_wo, s->pa, s->paio)) {
> +                qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
> +                              "Error: write idx<%u>, bit<%u>\n",
> +                              s->pa, s->paio);
> +                break;
> +            } else {
> +                SET_WRITTEN_BIT(s->fuse_wo, s->pa, s->paio);

Shouldn't the write operation below be moved to this else branch?

> +            }
> +        }
> +
>          /* write to backend */
>          if (s->blk) {
>              blk_pwrite(s->blk, s->pa * SIFIVE_U_OTP_FUSE_WORD, &val32,
> @@ -215,6 +233,9 @@ static void sifive_u_otp_reset(DeviceState *dev)
>      /* Make a valid content of serial number */
>      s->fuse[SIFIVE_U_OTP_SERIAL_ADDR] = s->serial;
>      s->fuse[SIFIVE_U_OTP_SERIAL_ADDR + 1] = ~(s->serial);
> +
> +    /* Initialize write-once map */
> +    memset(s->fuse_wo, 0x00, sizeof(s->fuse_wo));
>  }
>
>  static void sifive_u_otp_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
> diff --git a/include/hw/riscv/sifive_u_otp.h b/include/hw/riscv/sifive_u_otp.h
> index dea1df6f6c..ab6e46b013 100644
> --- a/include/hw/riscv/sifive_u_otp.h
> +++ b/include/hw/riscv/sifive_u_otp.h
> @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ typedef struct SiFiveUOTPState {
>      uint32_t ptrim;
>      uint32_t pwe;
>      uint32_t fuse[SIFIVE_U_OTP_NUM_FUSES];
> +    uint32_t fuse_wo[SIFIVE_U_OTP_NUM_FUSES];
>      /* config */
>      uint32_t serial;
>      BlockBackend   *blk;
> --

Regards,
Bin



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]