[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH V3] target/riscv: Bugfix reserved bits in PTE for RV64
From: |
Bin Meng |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH V3] target/riscv: Bugfix reserved bits in PTE for RV64 |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:35:41 +0800 |
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 12:49 PM <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> From: Guo Ren <address@hidden>
>
nits: the title is probably better to be rephrased to: Ignore reserved
bits when calculating PPN for RV64
> Highest 10 bits of PTE are reserved in riscv-privileged, ref: [1], so we
> need to ignore them. They can not be a part of ppn.
nits: cannot
>
> 1: The RISC-V Instruction Set Manual, Volume II: Privileged Architecture
> 4.4 Sv39: Page-Based 39-bit Virtual-Memory System
> 4.5 Sv48: Page-Based 48-bit Virtual-Memory System
>
> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <address@hidden>
> Reviewed-by: Liu Zhiwei <address@hidden>
> ---
> target/riscv/cpu_bits.h | 3 +++
> target/riscv/cpu_helper.c | 4 +++-
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> ---
> Changelog V3:
nits: normally we put changelog before the changed file summary above,
and there is no need to put another ---
> - Use UUL define for PTE_RESERVED.
> - Keep ppn >> PTE_PPN_SHIFT
>
> Changelog V2:
> - Bugfix pte destroyed cause boot fail
> - Change to AND with a mask instead of shifting both directions
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h b/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
> index e998348..cdc62a8 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
> @@ -470,6 +470,9 @@
> #define PTE_D 0x080 /* Dirty */
> #define PTE_SOFT 0x300 /* Reserved for Software */
>
> +/* Reserved highest 10 bits in PTE */
> +#define PTE_RESERVED 0xFFC0000000000000ULL
Can we define the macro for RV32 too, so that (see below)
> +
> /* Page table PPN shift amount */
> #define PTE_PPN_SHIFT 10
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
> index 87dd6a6..7e04ff5 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
> @@ -258,10 +258,12 @@ restart:
> }
> #if defined(TARGET_RISCV32)
> target_ulong pte = ldl_phys(cs->as, pte_addr);
> + hwaddr ppn = pte;
> #elif defined(TARGET_RISCV64)
> target_ulong pte = ldq_phys(cs->as, pte_addr);
> + hwaddr ppn = pte & ~PTE_RESERVED;
> #endif
> - hwaddr ppn = pte >> PTE_PPN_SHIFT;
> + ppn = ppn >> PTE_PPN_SHIFT;
we can just do this in this single line?
>
> if (!(pte & PTE_V)) {
> /* Invalid PTE */
> --
Regards,
Bin
- [PATCH V3] target/riscv: Bugfix reserved bits in PTE for RV64, guoren, 2019/09/25
- Re: [PATCH V3] target/riscv: Bugfix reserved bits in PTE for RV64, Alistair Francis, 2019/09/25
- Re: [PATCH V3] target/riscv: Bugfix reserved bits in PTE for RV64, Guo Ren, 2019/09/25
- Re: [PATCH V3] target/riscv: Bugfix reserved bits in PTE for RV64, Jonathan Behrens, 2019/09/25
- Re: [PATCH V3] target/riscv: Bugfix reserved bits in PTE for RV64, Guo Ren, 2019/09/25
- Re: [PATCH V3] target/riscv: Bugfix reserved bits in PTE for RV64, Jonathan Behrens, 2019/09/25
- Re: [PATCH V3] target/riscv: Bugfix reserved bits in PTE for RV64, Guo Ren, 2019/09/25
- Re: [PATCH V3] target/riscv: Bugfix reserved bits in PTE for RV64, Alistair Francis, 2019/09/25
Re: [PATCH V3] target/riscv: Bugfix reserved bits in PTE for RV64,
Bin Meng <=