[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-riscv] [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v7 33/42] exec: Replac
Edgar E. Iglesias
Re: [Qemu-riscv] [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v7 33/42] exec: Replace device_endian with MemOp
Tue, 20 Aug 2019 05:11:46 +0200
On Mon, 19 Aug. 2019, 23:01 Richard Henderson, <address@hidden
On 8/19/19 11:29 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 19/08/19 20:28, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 16/08/19 12:12, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> This patch is *huge*, more than 800kB. It keeps being stuck in the the
>>> filter of the qemu-s390x list each time you send it. Please:
>>> 1) Try to break it up in more digestible pieces, e.g. change only one
>>> subsystem at a time (this is also better reviewable by people who are
>>> interested in one area)
>> This is not really possible, since the patch is basically a
>> search-and-replace. You could perhaps use some magic
>> ("DEVICE_MEMOP_ENDIAN" or something like that) to allow a split, but it
>> would introduce more complication than anything else.
> I'm stupid, at this point of the series it _would_ be possible to split
> the patch by subsystem. Still not sure it would be actually an advantage.
It might be easier to review if we split by symbol, one rename per patch over
the entire code base.
Or if we review your script (I assume this wasn't a manual change). I'm not sure it's realistic to have review on the entire patch or patches.
[Qemu-riscv] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 33/42] exec: Replace device_endian with MemOp, tony.nguyen, 2019/08/16
Re: [Qemu-riscv] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 00/42] Invert Endian bit in SPARCv9 MMU TTE, Richard Henderson, 2019/08/18
- Re: [Qemu-riscv] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 00/42] Invert Endian bit in SPARCv9 MMU TTE, (continued)