qemu-riscv
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-riscv] [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv4 3/6] RISC-V: Check for the effect


From: Richard Henderson
Subject: Re: [Qemu-riscv] [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv4 3/6] RISC-V: Check for the effective memory privilege mode during PMP checks
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 19:00:53 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0

On 6/27/19 2:18 PM, Hesham Almatary wrote:
> @@ -392,19 +392,27 @@ bool riscv_cpu_tlb_fill(CPUState *cs, vaddr address, 
> int size,
>      int prot;
>      bool pmp_violation = false;
>      int ret = TRANSLATE_FAIL;
> +    int mode = mmu_idx;
> 
>      qemu_log_mask(CPU_LOG_MMU, "%s ad %" VADDR_PRIx " rw %d mmu_idx %d\n",
>                    __func__, address, access_type, mmu_idx);
> 
>      ret = get_physical_address(env, &pa, &prot, address, access_type, 
> mmu_idx);
> 
> +    if (mode == PRV_M && access_type != MMU_INST_FETCH) {
> +        if (get_field(env->mstatus, MSTATUS_MPRV)) {
> +            mode = get_field(env->mstatus, MSTATUS_MPP);
> +        }
> +    }

This hunk looks like it belongs in riscv_cpu_mmu_index instead.
Passing the (corrected) mmu_idx on to pmp_hart_has_privs looks right.


r~



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]