qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH qemu v2] ppc: Define SETFIELD for the ppc target


From: Daniel Henrique Barboza
Subject: Re: [PATCH qemu v2] ppc: Define SETFIELD for the ppc target
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 12:37:38 -0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0

Alexey,

Gitlab does not like what you're doing here. Several cross compile runners
fails with errors like these (this is from cross-win64-system):


../hw/intc/pnv_xive.c: In function 'pnv_xive_block_id':
3328/builds/danielhb/qemu/target/ppc/cpu.h:45:33: error: overflow in conversion 
from 'long long unsigned int' to 'long int' changes value from 
'4222124650659840' to '0' [-Werror=overflow]
3329   45 | #define PPC_BITMASK(bs, be)     ((PPC_BIT(bs) - PPC_BIT(be)) | 
PPC_BIT(bs))
3330      |                                 
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
3331/builds/danielhb/qemu/target/ppc/cpu.h:57:49: note: in definition of macro 
'MASK_TO_LSH'
3332   57 | #define MASK_TO_LSH(m)          (__builtin_ffsl(m) - 1)
3333      |                                                 ^
3334../hw/intc/pnv_xive.c:80:15: note: in expansion of macro 'GETFIELD'
3335   80 |         blk = GETFIELD(PC_TCTXT_CHIPID, cfg_val);
3336      |               ^~~~~~~~
3337../hw/intc/pnv_xive_regs.h:77:41: note: in expansion of macro 'PPC_BITMASK'
3338   77 | #define  PC_TCTXT_CHIPID                PPC_BITMASK(12, 15)
3339      |                                         ^~~~~~~~~~~
3340../hw/intc/pnv_xive.c:80:24: note: in expansion of macro 'PC_TCTXT_CHIPID'
3341   80 |         blk = GETFIELD(PC_TCTXT_CHIPID, cfg_val);
3342      |                        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
3343/builds/danielhb/qemu/target/ppc/cpu.h:58:46: error: right shift count is 
negative [-Werror=shift-count-negative]
3344   58 | #define GETFIELD(m, v)          (((v) & (m)) >> MASK_TO_LSH(m))
3345      |                                              ^~
3346../hw/intc/pnv_xive.c:80:15: note: in expansion of macro 'GETFIELD'
3347   80 |         blk = GETFIELD(PC_TCTXT_CHIPID, cfg_val);
3348      |               ^~~~~~~~
../hw/intc/pnv_xive.c: In function 'pnv_xive_vst_addr':
3350/builds/danielhb/qemu/target/ppc/cpu.h:45:33: error: overflow in conversion 
from 'long long unsigned int' to 'long int' changes value from 
'13835058055282163712' to '0' [-Werror=overflow]
3351   45 | #define PPC_BITMASK(bs, be)     ((PPC_BIT(bs) - PPC_BIT(be)) | 
PPC_BIT(bs))
3352      |                                 
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
3353/builds/danielhb/qemu/target/ppc/cpu.h:57:49: note: in definition of macro 
'MASK_TO_LSH'
3354   57 | #define MASK_TO_LSH(m)          (__builtin_ffsl(m) - 1)
3355      |                                                 ^
3356../hw/intc/pnv_xive.c:226:9: note: in expansion of macro 'GETFIELD'
3357  226 |     if (GETFIELD(VSD_MODE, vsd) == VSD_MODE_FORWARD) {
3358      |         ^~~~~~~~
3359../hw/intc/pnv_xive_regs.h:230:33: note: in expansion of macro 'PPC_BITMASK'
3360  230 | #define VSD_MODE                PPC_BITMASK(0, 1)
3361      |                                 ^~~~~~~~~~~
3362../hw/intc/pnv_xive.c:226:18: note: in expansion of macro 'VSD_MODE'
3363  226 |     if (GETFIELD(VSD_MODE, vsd) == VSD_MODE_FORWARD) {
3364      |                  ^~~~~~~~
3365/builds/danielhb/qemu/target/ppc/cpu.h:58:46: error: right shift count is 
negative [-Werror=shift-count-negative]
3366   58 | #define GETFIELD(m, v)          (((v) & (m)) >> MASK_TO_LSH(m))
3367      |                                              ^~
3368../hw/intc/pnv_xive.c:226:9: note: in expansion of macro 'GETFIELD'
3369  226 |     if (GETFIELD(VSD_MODE, vsd) == VSD_MODE_FORWARD) {
3370      |         ^~~~~~~~


You can see the results here:

https://gitlab.com/danielhb/qemu/-/jobs/2636585317

Other failing runners include cross-armel-system and cross-mips-system, so I 
don't
think that the error is related to Windows specifics.


I guess we're missing an uint64_t cast somewhere like you did in the v2 of
this patch. The skiboot macros as is will not cut it.


Thanks,


Daniel


On 6/22/22 02:08, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
It keeps repeating, move it to the header. This uses __builtin_ffsl() to
allow using the macros in #define.

This is not using the QEMU's FIELD macros as this would require changing
all such macros found in skiboot (the PPC PowerNV firmware).

Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
---
Changes:
v2:
* preserved the comment about skiboot
* copied the actual macros from skiboot:
https://github.com/open-power/skiboot/blob/master/include/bitutils.h#L31
---
  include/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb3_regs.h | 16 ----------------
  target/ppc/cpu.h                    | 12 ++++++++++++
  hw/intc/pnv_xive.c                  | 20 --------------------
  hw/intc/pnv_xive2.c                 | 20 --------------------
  hw/pci-host/pnv_phb4.c              | 16 ----------------
  5 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb3_regs.h 
b/include/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb3_regs.h
index a174ef1f7045..38f8ce9d7406 100644
--- a/include/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb3_regs.h
+++ b/include/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb3_regs.h
@@ -12,22 +12,6 @@
#include "qemu/host-utils.h" -/*
- * QEMU version of the GETFIELD/SETFIELD macros
- *
- * These are common with the PnvXive model.
- */
-static inline uint64_t GETFIELD(uint64_t mask, uint64_t word)
-{
-    return (word & mask) >> ctz64(mask);
-}
-
-static inline uint64_t SETFIELD(uint64_t mask, uint64_t word,
-                                uint64_t value)
-{
-    return (word & ~mask) | ((value << ctz64(mask)) & mask);
-}
-
  /*
   * PBCQ XSCOM registers
   */
diff --git a/target/ppc/cpu.h b/target/ppc/cpu.h
index 6d78078f379d..e45cc7a8c115 100644
--- a/target/ppc/cpu.h
+++ b/target/ppc/cpu.h
@@ -47,6 +47,18 @@
                                   PPC_BIT32(bs))
  #define PPC_BITMASK8(bs, be)    ((PPC_BIT8(bs) - PPC_BIT8(be)) | PPC_BIT8(bs))
+/*
+ * QEMU version of the GETFIELD/SETFIELD macros
+ *
+ * It might be better to use the existing extract64() and
+ * deposit64() but this means that all the register definitions will
+ * change and become incompatible with the ones found in skiboot.
+ */
+#define MASK_TO_LSH(m)          (__builtin_ffsl(m) - 1)
+#define GETFIELD(m, v)          (((v) & (m)) >> MASK_TO_LSH(m))
+#define SETFIELD(m, v, val) \
+        (((v) & ~(m)) | ((((typeof(v))(val)) << MASK_TO_LSH(m)) & (m)))
+
  
/*****************************************************************************/
  /* Exception vectors definitions                                             
*/
  enum {
diff --git a/hw/intc/pnv_xive.c b/hw/intc/pnv_xive.c
index 1ce1d7b07d63..c7b75ed12ee0 100644
--- a/hw/intc/pnv_xive.c
+++ b/hw/intc/pnv_xive.c
@@ -66,26 +66,6 @@ static const XiveVstInfo vst_infos[] = {
      qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "XIVE[%x] - " fmt "\n",              \
                    (xive)->chip->chip_id, ## __VA_ARGS__);
-/*
- * QEMU version of the GETFIELD/SETFIELD macros
- *
- * TODO: It might be better to use the existing extract64() and
- * deposit64() but this means that all the register definitions will
- * change and become incompatible with the ones found in skiboot.
- *
- * Keep it as it is for now until we find a common ground.
- */
-static inline uint64_t GETFIELD(uint64_t mask, uint64_t word)
-{
-    return (word & mask) >> ctz64(mask);
-}
-
-static inline uint64_t SETFIELD(uint64_t mask, uint64_t word,
-                                uint64_t value)
-{
-    return (word & ~mask) | ((value << ctz64(mask)) & mask);
-}
-
  /*
   * When PC_TCTXT_CHIPID_OVERRIDE is configured, the PC_TCTXT_CHIPID
   * field overrides the hardwired chip ID in the Powerbus operations
diff --git a/hw/intc/pnv_xive2.c b/hw/intc/pnv_xive2.c
index f31c53c28dd2..f22ce5ca59ae 100644
--- a/hw/intc/pnv_xive2.c
+++ b/hw/intc/pnv_xive2.c
@@ -75,26 +75,6 @@ static const XiveVstInfo vst_infos[] = {
      qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "XIVE[%x] - " fmt "\n",              \
                    (xive)->chip->chip_id, ## __VA_ARGS__);
-/*
- * QEMU version of the GETFIELD/SETFIELD macros
- *
- * TODO: It might be better to use the existing extract64() and
- * deposit64() but this means that all the register definitions will
- * change and become incompatible with the ones found in skiboot.
- *
- * Keep it as it is for now until we find a common ground.
- */
-static inline uint64_t GETFIELD(uint64_t mask, uint64_t word)
-{
-    return (word & mask) >> ctz64(mask);
-}
-
-static inline uint64_t SETFIELD(uint64_t mask, uint64_t word,
-                                uint64_t value)
-{
-    return (word & ~mask) | ((value << ctz64(mask)) & mask);
-}
-
  /*
   * TODO: Document block id override
   */
diff --git a/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb4.c b/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb4.c
index 6594016121a3..5d72c0c432b2 100644
--- a/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb4.c
+++ b/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb4.c
@@ -31,22 +31,6 @@
      qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "phb4_pec[%d:%d]: " fmt "\n",        \
                    (pec)->chip_id, (pec)->index, ## __VA_ARGS__)
-/*
- * QEMU version of the GETFIELD/SETFIELD macros
- *
- * These are common with the PnvXive model.
- */
-static inline uint64_t GETFIELD(uint64_t mask, uint64_t word)
-{
-    return (word & mask) >> ctz64(mask);
-}
-
-static inline uint64_t SETFIELD(uint64_t mask, uint64_t word,
-                                uint64_t value)
-{
-    return (word & ~mask) | ((value << ctz64(mask)) & mask);
-}
-
  static PCIDevice *pnv_phb4_find_cfg_dev(PnvPHB4 *phb)
  {
      PCIHostState *pci = PCI_HOST_BRIDGE(phb);



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]