RE: [PATCH] target/ppc: code motion from translate_init.c.inc to gdbstub.c

[Fabiano Rosas]

Bruno Piazera Larsen <bruno.larsen@eldorado.org.br> writes:

> All the code and git related feedback as been done, with the exception of
>
>> > +gchar *ppc_gdb_arch_name(CPUState *cs);
>> > +
>> > +
>> >  #endif /* PPC_CPU_H */
>> > diff --git a/target/ppc/gdbstub.c b/target/ppc/gdbstub.c
>> > index c28319fb97..0c016b8483 100644
>> > --- a/target/ppc/gdbstub.c
>> > +++ b/target/ppc/gdbstub.c
>> > @@ -20,6 +20,10 @@
>> >  #include "qemu/osdep.h"
>> >  #include "cpu.h"
>> >  #include "exec/gdbstub.h"
>> > +#ifdef CONFIG_TCG
>> > +#include "exec/helper-proto.h"
>> > +#endif
>> We still need to figure out where to move the vscr helpers so that both
>> TCG and !TCG code can see them. But we cannot build without TCG
>> currently anyway so I guess it's ok to leave the ifdef.
>
> Actually, since we're moving the helpers away, I think it's better to remove 
> the ifdefs...
> The helper-proto.h is here only for the vscr, so it's going away before we 
> support the !tcg build anyway. Thoughts?

Sure, that's reasonable.

>
>> > +
>> > +void ppc_cpu_gdb_init(CPUState *cs, PowerPCCPUClass *pcc)
>> > +{
>> > +
>> > +    if (pcc->insns_flags & PPC_FLOAT) {
>> > +        gdb_register_coprocessor(cs, gdb_get_float_reg, gdb_set_float_reg,
>> > +                                 33, "power-fpu.xml", 0);
>> > +    }
>> > +    if (pcc->insns_flags & PPC_ALTIVEC) {
>> > +        gdb_register_coprocessor(cs, gdb_get_avr_reg, gdb_set_avr_reg,
>> > +                                 34, "power-altivec.xml", 0);
>> > +    }
>> > +    if (pcc->insns_flags & PPC_SPE) {
>> > +        gdb_register_coprocessor(cs, gdb_get_spe_reg, gdb_set_spe_reg,
>> > +                                 34, "power-spe.xml", 0);
>> > +    }
>> > +    if (pcc->insns_flags2 & PPC2_VSX) {
>> > +        gdb_register_coprocessor(cs, gdb_get_vsx_reg, gdb_set_vsx_reg,
>> > +                                 32, "power-vsx.xml", 0);
>> > +    }
>> > +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
>> > +    gdb_register_coprocessor(cs, gdb_get_spr_reg, gdb_set_spr_reg,
>> > +                             pcc->gdb_num_sprs, "power-spr.xml", 0);
>> > +#endif
>> > +}
>>
>> Same here.
>
> This function was actually created by me, wasn't in the translate_init.c.inc. 
> Since we're moving gdb fuinctions to gdbstub.c, I thought it made sense to 
> hide the logic behind how to register coprocessors correctly as well. that's 
> why there is no removal of this function on the diff. Should I move it back 
> to ppc_cpu_realize or is this a good plan?

Right, but you created the function by refactoring the existing code in
translate_init.c.inc so the diff still needs to contain the removal of
the gdb_register_coprocessor calls from that file.

>
>
>
> Bruno Piazera Larsen
>
> Instituto de Pesquisas 
> ELDORADO<http://clickemailmkt.eldorado.org.br/ls/click?upn=UPoxpeIcHnAcbUZyo7TTaswyiVb1TXP3jEbQqiiJKKGsxOn8hBEs5ZsMLQfXkKuKXZ7MVDg0ij9eG8HV4TXI75dBzDiNGLxQ8Xx5PzCVNt6TpGrzBbU-2Biu0o69X5ce-2FW-2FOk1uUipuK0fZnWXJEgbRw-3D-3DJY4T_wWk-2BG6VvNBoa1YzxYjhCdFS9IfANIaBzDSklR1NyyrKOI1wj0P-2BdBFcuO4FnHcsA1MyHu0ly1Yt3oDMp7KKdJPM68iKuI2jiRH5v4B0d8wf3chU3qy5n5iXWnW1QjSaNFHOgELzxaP-2FnesTeBgJ5dFkjH4f279sVQpOtyjw5xAqj34M6pgNRAxVvuXif4IWDcVzXg1FzfYlEfkKzr9vvpA3Hg8kitwMtlU3zwbQUBCgL30fQoJPcRPMGKyOY8RmoAlXNqTJYDYIvqmfnI7KLUvw6vKB5R-2B5q1FJRAzX7H-2BmF0NnDET6jMLuIqtCcVIch>
>
> Departamento Computação Embarcada
>
> Analista de Software Trainee
>
> Aviso Legal - Disclaimer<https://www.eldorado.org.br/disclaimer.html>